SCCD extended support for less able learners is multiple-fold and is divided into stages and strategies.
Area 1: WRITING WORKSHOP
IDENTIFYING the challenge
Learners with weak writing abilities like sentence structure, grammar, punctuation and comprehension will be identified after work is submitted in the writing workshop.
PLANNING to overcome the challenge
Observation and documentation will be made on the potential problems and challenges that this learner might encounter.
SUPPORT to improve the challenge
● In the initial stage, there will be more verbal feedback given to this learner and the learner should be asked to do smaller assignments compared to other learners.
● The learner will not proceed to another unit until the challenges are successfully addressed. With this learner, repetition of instructions should be made consistently.
● While the learner is coming to grips with writing, different forms of assessment must be engaged in like oral assessment, slides format, and professional discussions. The learner should be signposted to attend literacy classes where-ever available.
● The learner will be mandated to attend all compulsory writing workshop sessions with various groups until the writing skills are on par to meet standards of the qualification.
AREA 2: FIRST UNIT: WRITING
IDENTIFYING the challenge
The second opportunity to identify learners at risk of dropping out is after their first written assignment.
This should be based on (1) punctuality of submitting the assignment (2) volume of work submitted and (3) volume of help needed in completing the assignment.
PLANNING to overcome the challenge
A note must be made on the potential problems and challenges that this learner might encounter in future assignments
An action plan must be drawn up for the learner to address the specific areas of weaknesses in the assignment. This should include mandatory repeat sessions on the same unit or same topic and no new work in new units should be marked until there is compliance.
The learner should write reflective journals about what they have learnt in all repeat session
SUPPORT to improve the challenge
● The learner must be given a different timetable to hand in assignments and assignments should be done in smaller volumes like one outcome per submission.
● The learner must have a session where they are expected to look at “passed” work and identify key features of that work they must comply with in their own writing.
● The learner must be encouraged to use this to independently evaluate their work before submitting.
● The learner must not proceed to another unit until the challenges are successfully addressed. With this learner, repetition of instructions should be made consistently.
● While the learner is coming to grips with writing, different forms of assessment must be engaged in like oral assessment, slides format, and professional discussions.
● The learner must be signposted to attend literacy classes where-ever available.
● The learner must be mandated to attend all compulsory writing workshop sessions with various groups until the writing skills are on par to meet standards of the qualification.
Area 3: POOR ATTENDANCE
Learners with poor attendance should be regarded as learners who have missed
1. two classes in a three-session unit
2. two classes in a four session unit
3. two classes in every four session
4. two or more missed tutorial sessions and
One-to-one should be logged as attendance percentage.
What constitutes attendance
The physical verified presence of learners for 2. 5 hours in every three hour session and 3.5 hours in every four-hour session
What should not be marked as present should be
(a) learners on zoom sessions with cameras off
(b) learners arriving more than thirty minutes to onsite sessions or zoom sessions
(c) learners attending classes through repeat taped sessions only.
IDENTIFYING the challenge
Learners with poor attendance should be identified immediately through the register and robust action be taken.
PLANNING to overcome the challenge
A conversation must be held with the learner to identify a course of action to be taken like changing cohorts and times of sessions.
SUPPORT to improve the challenge
● A conversation must be held with the learner to identify if it’s a case of time management, travel distance, work schedules or family commitments.
● Close monitoring must take place and have the learner actively be involved in counting their hours of attendance percentage for each term or unit.
● Positive support must be provided so as not to discourage the learner.
● The learner must be sent the end of the unit attendance report as a reminder of their own commitments.
Area 4: REPEAT MARKINGS
It is standard that work MUST NOT BE MARKED MORE THAN TWICE ELECTRONICALLY.
● The learner must be instructed how to complete assignments at the end of tutorial sessions. This makes the tutorial sessions very important and should not be removed from sessions, shortened or circumvented in any way for any reasons whatsoever.
● It is improper and a breach of contract to shorten learners sessions or remove or rearrange their training format.
● Learner’s work should be submitted electronically and detailed dmarkings provided. The lecturer is expected to date each marking in the right margin of the work.
● This work must be returned to the learner within the “marking cycle”. Each cohort should have a clearly published marking cycle so they know their work is marked every Saturday or every Monday or every Tuesday. This should remain constant.
● The learner will act on the feedback and return the work to the lecturer within a previously established timeframe.
● The work will then be revisited again and final electronic comments provided.
At this time either of two things will happen: (a) the work gets signed off or (b) the learner is told that revisions are minor and they can do them and submit in hard copy in their folder for formal assessment.
IDENTIFYING the challenge
If the work is still below par, a third electronic marking SHOULD NEVER TAKE PLACE as this signals a problem for both lecturer and student. It can be that the lecturer’s action points are not clear or in a language the learner understands or the assignment is not clear enough for the learner to comprehend.
PLANNING to overcome the challenge
● Immediate intervention will be had with lecturer and learner. This should be done through a one-on-one tutorial session where the assignment is repeated, notes taken and a reflective journal be produced by the learner as to what they were taught in the session and what needs to be done.
SUPPORT to improve the challenge
● The learner can also be paired with a stronger learner or peer support or be assigned to a support lecturer.
● The assignment should be scaffolded for the learner with examples of how to structure an opening paragraph, how to reference a particular fact or how to present in table format to decrease the volume of writing
Area 5: IDENTIFYING THE DROPOUT POINTS FOR LEARNERS ON THE TRAINING
The highest dropout point for trainees on the DET is at the end of Unit 1 and the second highest dropout point is in the middle of term 2.
The highest dropout and disengaged time for learners on Level 3 is in the middle of the training and around placement and their placement units.
IDENTIFYING the challenge
It is crucial at this point that lecturers identify learners who fall into the following categories.
● Does the learner have outstanding work to be submitted? Outstanding work should constitute assignments that are two months late in submitting or being signed off
● Learners with no work being signed off
● Learners with high levels of absenteeism a
● Learner still struggling with writing skills
Learners will not be allowed to progress into the next term or embark on a new unit as this does not solve the problem and increases the frustration of the learner.
PLANNING to overcome the challenge
● Before the end of the term an immediate face to face intervention must be held to identify steps for moving forward.
● These should include the learner being mandated to repeat the term with another cohort or repeating the unit with another cohort before they can move forward to new and challenging work or placement.
SUPPORT to improve the challenge
Other forms of assessment must be used. This should include different types of assessment like professional discussion, verbal assessment, GRIDs and brochures and writing articles, debates and other forms of oral or ipsative assessments.
Area 6: THE SILENT MASSES
IDENTIFYING the challenge
Lecturers must identify and make a mental note of all silent learners as early as the very first lesson or the writing workshop. Silent learners are dropout learners.
Profile of silent learners and challenges
1) Expect additional marking
2) Expect them to remain longer on the training
3) Expect high levels of complaints
PLANNING to overcome the challenge
● Lesson delivery should be designed with these learners specifically in mind.
● There should be built in tasks for them to do in the lesson delivery like leading a discussion on a specific slide, making a presentation or heading a group of learners in a project.
● SUPPORT to improve the challenge
● Lecturers must seek and create opportunities for out of class engagement with silent learners to gather feedback on classes, points of views, issues, challenges and concerns since they will not be voiced in open forums.
Area 7: Deferrals and Special Considerations
These learners account for high level dropouts as special considerations and deferral creates a pocket of disengagement and re-engagement.
IDENTIFYING the challenge
It is important to know why learners are needing these changes of status and discuss other ways other than a deferral. Deferrals are currently too easily resorted to as a solution and are used as a method of postponing having to deal with the learner.
Deferrals are preventive and avoidable and should not be an automatic process, but rather, one needing to be justified and only opted for as a last resort in support.
I am expecting to see deferrals decrease by more than 70% in the coming academic year as reasons for deferrals are all avoidable
Most frequent reasons for deferrals
1) Too many missed classes
2) Late or no submissions of assignments
3) Lack of learner engagement
4) Lack of marked work or repeat marking of work without sign-off
PLANNING to overcome the challenge
● Using a strict system of early identification, plan and support deferrals are avoidable.
● Lecturers should observe, plan and support robustly to get learners to remain on task and track progress through attendance and assignments.
SUPPORT to improve the challenge
● As early as the first unit, lecturers should spot and profile abilities by identifying learners who tend to ask questions outside of the box, ask questions right after the same information was provided, don’t seem to be able to follow directives or need to be given the same directives repeatedly.
● These are signs that there exists communication problems on different levels of engagement.
● There might be other needs as well like emotional and mental needs.
● Repeat markings with lengthy comments and directives does more harm than good as it feeds into the learners sense of failure and inability to achieve with repeated lengthy comments over extended periods of time. Lecturers should avoid such situations at all costs and communicate with learners verbally instead and scaffold their work and have them write reflective journals at the end of classes on what they have learned.
Area 8: Portfolio term
All DET learners have a portfolio term. This is the third term when lectures are completed and learners attend classes weekly to receive support and complete portfolios.
The portfolio term must be a timetabled period where learners attend classes because the contract states a year and a term.
Lecturers must meet with learners in their timetabled classes to review portfolios.
All sessions should be collective and on site to facilitate being able to go through workplace evidence.
This should be period for onsite observations
IDENTIFYING the challenge
The Challenge for learners in this phase of their training whether Level 3 or DET is the sudden lack of regulated or timetaled interaction.
This accounts for a large number of learners not completing their training even when it gets to this last phase or being on the programme for extended periods of time, sometimes even longer than the actual training itself.
Planning to improve the challenge
Learners in their period of portfolio term should be timetabled as regular term and should meet and attend classes inside their timetable. Other learners on the DET programme must be on site in regular classes for a year and a term as their contract suggests.
These sessions will be every two weeks in whole classes to avoid the human resource of seeing learners one at a time.
SUPPORT to improve the challenge
● In these sessions, learners should have access to passed portfolios to make a visual connection as to what their own work should look like.
● There should be a predominance of scaffolding to show learners how to identify workplace evidence and how they should meet the assessment criteria.
● This evidence should be used to be able to remove learners from the training after two years.
● With the exception of learners who went into placement late (after the second term) all learners who have not completed their training in that portfolio term, will then need to work on their own to complete their portfolios.
● The same rule of thumb applies for learners on the Level 3 programmes.
Both programmes have allowances for a portfolio term and these need to be utilised more effectively and productively.